Timberwolves ’24

Like all fans of the Minnesota Timberwolves I had high expectations for their 2024-25 season, coming off their surprising run to the Western Conference finals earlier this year. Surely Jaden McDaniels would grow (based on the contract they gave him); surely Anthony Edwards would continue his rise to superstardom, after his impressive stint with the U.S. Olympic basketball all-stars. Trading away Karl Anthony Towns just before the season started was a surprise, but not a bad one. Towns wasn’t going to get any better, and there was some question how well he fit in with Edwards and the uptempo style of play Coach Chris Finch was trying to install. In fact, the T’Wolves third-place finish, a game or two out of first, was accomplished largely with the injury-prone Towns out of action. In the playoffs, he had some games where he contributed, but in others he disappeared. Moreover, in sending Towns to the Knicks, the Wolves acquired Julius Randle, one All-Star for another, plus the intriguing Dante DiVicenzo, the kind of scrappy player and three-point guard the Wolves were missing.

The season started well, with predictable wins against lesser opponents, but things quickly went south, including losses in back-to-back games with Portland that most experts had thought of as gimme wins. As of this writing, the Timberwolves have been reduced to a .500 record, and given the strength of the West it’s hard to see them rising much above their middling standing in their conference. Instead of vying for dominance, I expect the year to play out as a slog to a play-in spot in the playoffs.

What’s going wrong? I’ll start with Rudy Gobert, who was inexplicably named Defensive Player of the Year last season. When it came to the playoffs, he was continually exposed by the likes of Luka Doncic, Nikola Jokic and Kyrie Irving, all of whom moved around and shot over him at will. I have to think received those DOY votes based on his reputation and the fact that he is such a weak offensive player. McDaniels remains an enigma on offense, having a “breakout” every fourth or fifth game, but otherwise seeming to be an afterthought to the Edwards/Randle offense. Mike Conley is 38 and, yes, getting old, and DiVicenzo has yet to show much consistency. For some reason, Finch uses only three players off his bench, and they are alternately stellar or off their game, a large reason for the .500 record. The euphoria over the Wolves’ two draft choices–Dillingham and Shannon– does not seem to have reached, or affected, Coach Finch. Everyone likes to see young players develop, and over the long course of the season the regulars will need to rest. Not to mention that every team in every sport these days is struck by injuries, and there’s no reason to expect Minnesota to be exempt. From a fan’s (my) point of view, limiting the active roster to eight players makes following the team that much less interesting.

In short, my expectations for the season have been tempered. I won’t get upset, or terribly disappointed, by every loss. I trust there will be good games, times to rejoice, but unless the Wolves develop a compelling personality, like the defense they boasted last year, I’ll root but without much passion. An academic exercise.

Minnesota Sports Fans

It is well known that Minnesota sports fans expect the worst when it comes down to a big game for their team. Whether this stems from the Vikings’ 0-4 record in early Super Bowls or a general Midwestern lack of self-confidence,  I don’t know. Nor do I know whether this defeatism is at all unique to Minnesota or is typical of small-market cities. I do know that, in contrast, New York fans expect championships from their teams, even when the Giants, Knicks and Yankees are clearly performing at sub-par levels. It was, therefore, a rare case of “euphoria,” as one columnist described it, when the stars magically aligned: the Twins put together a 12-game win streak and the Timberwolves routed their first-round playoff opponents and opened their second round with two upset wins over the Nuggets. Could this really be happening in Minnesota?
Yesterday, things were back to normal. After fooling the national media, which had overlooked them all year, to label them favorites to win the NBA championship, the T’Wolves lost the next three games, badly, to Denver. The Twins, after compiling an astonishing 16 wins in 19 games to creep within a half-game of first place in their division, came home to face their nemesis, the Yankees, and fell flat. Minnesotans are free to despair once again.

Timberwolves

June 1: I don’t feel at all bad that the Timberwolves lost to the Mavericks in the Western Conference Finals. I’m sorry they didn’t win a second game and glad they at least won one. Dallas was clearly the superior team: not only did Doncic and Irving outperform Edwards and Towns, their secondary players–Gafford, Washington, Lively–were more impactful than any of the other Wolves, whose bench, and supposed defensive mainstay Gobert, notably underperformed. Dallas also had a more appealing style of play. Doncic led each game in assists, many of the colorful variety, while the Wolves continued their isolation ball play that turned me off in the Denver series. Maybe one reason the role players didn’t contribute is because they were left out of the action once Edwards or Towns got the ball and decided it was up to them to drive to the basket or shoot from distance. Of course the reverse could be true: Edwards and Towns may have felt they had to do it on their own because they couldn’t count on anyone else to make a shot. If someone like Alexander-Walker had gotten a hot hand, instead of whiffing every time, you wonder if the Wolves’ style of play, as well as their chances, might have changed. You also wonder why the Wolves are paying seven players who aren’t used in the playoffs. The third reason I’m not upset is that I wouldn’t want to see the Wolves lose to the Celtics in the Finals.

May 13: Although last night’s playoff loss to the Nuggets was the first Wolves game I have watched in its entirety this year, I feel qualified, and compelled, to make some observations.
The Wolves lost because the Nuggets hardly missed a shot, however difficult, shooting well over 60% for most of the game. The Wolves, by obvious contrast, shot poorly, missing the open three-pointers that Denver invariably made. Aaron Gordon, for one, made 11 of 12 shots. The Nuggets were more than 10% ahead of the Wolves in shooting, three-point and foul shot stats. No matter how much energy you play with, it’s hard to overcome those odds.
Anthony Edwards is the real deal. He is one of those players–LeBron, Kobe, MJ, Harden, et al.–who can scored singlehandedly whenever he wants (which is one of the things I don’t like about NBA basketball). He can drive to the hoop and score with either hand, or both. He can stop and pop anywhere in mid-range after dazzling dribbling. And he can swish long three-pointers without hesitation. And make his foul shots. It’s an irony of last night’s loss that the fatal sequence at the end of the half–a seven-point swing–that almost matched the final deficit–resulted from his losing the ball trying for the last shot.
Rudy Gobert’s DPOY award comes from reputation, not actual impact. His defense was not a factor in the game. He simply couldn’t guard Nikola Jokic and he left the rim unprotected numerous times. He doesn’t have the footwork or speed to match up with many players he switches on to, nor does he have the height and lift of someone like Wembanyana, whom he beat for the defensive award, to block or alter shots.
Jaden McDaniels is the black hole of the starting five. A year ago he was considered a cornerstone of the future, a running mate for Edwards and Towns as the Wolves built their team. All this year I’ve read of his superlative defense: the Wolves had enough scorers without him and he could justify his starting role with his cementing defense. Last night I saw none of it. And the Nuggets left him alone in the corner on offense, hoping he would shoot. Which he did, and missed. You could sense his lack of confidence. And considering that Denver was scoring every time down the court, each McDaniels miss was a killer. It will be interesting to see if the Wolves try to upgrade this position next year, although with only the 27th pick in the draft it will be hard, or change their rotation.
Karl Anthony Towns was almost singlehandedly responsible for the loss. It’s not just that he shoot poorly–1-for-10 in the first half–it was his attempts at playing isolation ball instead of letting the offense flow that knee-capped the Wolves in the early going. His specialty is the three-point shot, but he made only one and missed three. Too often he took it upon himself to dribble into the post and look for a lay-up or short floater. His dribble is so high and his moves so ponderous that the Nuggets easily collapsed on him and left him flailing and complaining to the refs.
Speaking of the refs, there was nothing here to change my opinion that officiating plays far too big a role in the game of basketball, more than in any other sport. There is contact on virtually every play that could be called a foul, so when the ref chooses to blow his whistle is almost an arbitrary act. And the impact is outsized. For one thing, it slows the game and is of no fan interest. More important, it affects what players are on the court: two quick ticky-tack fouls in the first quarter and your star goes to the bench. It also, of course, leads to players whining, not a good look.
All that said, I don’t think the Timberwolves are out of the series. Other than some ugly stretches in the first half, they played the Nuggets even and several times threatened to get back in the game, due mainly to Edwards’s efforts. Denver won’t shoot 60% for two more games, and you have to believe that Towns, who was great in Game 2, will learn and perform better. Also Nickeil Alexander-Walker should improve on his 1-for-7 shooting and horrible passing. Clearly, where the game is played is not as important as believed, as the road team has won all four so far. I predict that the Wolves will win one of the next two and we’ll get a Game Seven, which is as it should be.

Timberwolves

In their last three Playoff losses to the Memphis Grizzlies, the Minnesota Timberwolves led by double digits in the 4th quarter. All that means is that Memphis was the better team, for as long as I’ve been watching pro basketball, the only quarter that matters is the 4th. You can go further and say, all that matters is the last five minutes–or less. This is in contrast to baseball, where, once the Twins fell behind 5-0 in the first inning last night the game was basically over.

Still, there was much to be cheered about if you were a Minnesota fan. First, of course, was their entry in the Playoffs as the 7th seed, when no one predicted them to be a Playoff team this year. Just as encouraging was the performance of their two youngest players, Anthony Edwards and Jaden McDaniels, both drafted in 2020. Edwards, amazingly only 20 years old, was the best player on the court in the first half, scoring 20 points on driving layups and long three-pointers. Although not so dominant, he performed credibly the rest of the game. McDaniels, only recently back from injury, scored a season-high 24 p0ints off the bench and was ferocious on defense, as well. Their futures are bright.

The third T’wolf who distinguished himself–and there were really only three–was backup point guard Jordan McLaughlin. D’Angelo Russell bricked his first three shots and did little to ignite the offense. When McLaughlin entered the game the difference was palpable. Everyone moved with more purpose and his deft passes set up his teammates in rhythm for easy baskets. Plus, he shot 4-for-5 himself. Timberwolf coach Chris Finch obviously noticed the difference, as he replaced Russell with McLaughlin in the 4th with the game on the line. What this means for the future is anyone’s guess: I know too little of NBA economics to understand the significance of Russell’s “max” contract, but he has been a disappointment, as he was elsewhere, and if the Wolves could get value in a trade I’ll bet they would take it.

The other “max” contract belongs to Karl-Anthony Towns, who apparently earned his over the course of his best year in the pros. (I hadn’t watched a Timberwolves game before last night, but followed them daily in the paper and on highlights shows.) Towns, however, had a spotty record in these playoffs, turning in a no-show for every good performance. Last night was another clunker. Memphis used a quick double-team to stymie his offense, and you wonder if this will be a recurring problem in years to come. Moreover, he was responsible for two of the three key plays that finally turned the game in the Grizzlies’ favor: a flagrant foul on a sloppy block attempt and a misbegotten three-point effort from far out, the kind of “hero play” that Coach Finch had warned about. (The third dagger was Minnesota-native Tyus Jones’s 24-second-buzzer beater with one minute to play that turned a 1-point lead into 4.)

No one else made a significant contribution, pro or con, and by this I refer to Malik Beasley, Patrick Beverly and Jarrod Vanderbilt. Bench players who contributed substantially over the course of the season–Taureen Prince, Jaylen Nowell, Naz Reid–never left the bench, and it remains to be seen how or whether any of them–not to mention Jake Layman, Josh Okogie, Bolsenaro–will figure in the team’s future plans. One hopes that Prince and Nowell, in particular, will develop and create a solid core that can capitalize on the Playoff experience that Edwards, McDaniels and McLaughlin now have. Oh, and one hopes the T’wolves can add a rebounder: Memphis outrebounded Minnesota 56-37, including 17-6 on the offensive boards. That, better three-point shooting, and experience made the difference.

Stephen Curry

As much as like the Golden State Warriors – their personality, their style of play, their dominance – and Stephen Curry in particular, I wasn’t heartbroken by their loss in the NBA finals to the Toronto Raptors. For starters, they had every excuse for losing: injuries to Kevin Durant and, especially, Klay Thompson, meant it wasn’t the real Warriors that lost. Second, they had every chance to win (Game Six, at least): their best player, Curry, had a makeable three-point shot in the final seconds that would have given Golden State the victory. He missed, so they have no one to blame but themselves. Third, the Raptors’ win spread the wealth, something I always like about sports. It was the first championship, ever, for a Canadian team, and the Raptors are not likely to win again next year. There appeared to be no hard feelings between the teams, just a good moment for Sport.

Golden State Warriors

At this point we don’t know if the Golden State Warriors will survive Game 7 in Houston on Monday and advance to the NBA Finals, but the show they put on in Game 6 was both thrilling in itself and reason to hope we get to watch them some more this year.
I turned the TV on at halftime, when the Dubs were 10 points down to the Rockets and the halftime crew, Charles Barkley in particular, thought the end of their season might be near. The third quarter, however, started with a sudden 8-0 run for Golden State, and when you next looked up, they were leading by 20. The final score was 115-86, which meant the Warriors had outscored the Rockets by almost 40 points in one half. It was, however, how they did it that was so exciting.
First, it was their defense. James Harden, the league and Rockets’ MVP, had to this point in the playoffs appeared unstoppable, much like LeBron James. The Warriors, however, guarded him tightly through screens out deep, and when he drove to the basket, three bodies collapsed on him – and he didn’t get the foul calls he expected (maybe this will change when the series shifts back to Houston). Clearly, this tight coverage and his inability to defeat it damaged his confidence, for he began shooting three-point shots that missed the basket completely, as did his teammates.
Energized by their defensive successes, the Warriors’ offense exploded. First was Klay Thompson, who couldn’t miss a three-pointer, including an exclamation point from five feet behind the arc. Kevin Durant, who had shot 3-for-11 in the first half and had been widely criticized the last two games for playing isolation ball, found his mid-range jumper and showed that he can’t be guarded. The coups de grace, as usual, came from Steph Curry, who alternated three-point shots that seemed to barely scrape the net (like a perfect dive that barely ripples the water surface) with impossible driving layups through and around defenders a half-foot taller. Curry plays with such evident pleasure that when he’s hot he lights up his entire team and the arena above him. Last night was such a night.
I should add a PS on the Timberwolves’ quick exit from the playoffs at the Rockets’ hands. While they have three legitimate potential stars – and Jimmy Butler and Karl-Anthony Towns were just voted to the NBA All-Star Third Team – they show none of the cohesiveness of the Warriors. Once Anthony Wiggins, their other #1 draft choice, or Towns gets the ball, the play is usually over. There is no one on the team like Curry, who is constantly running with a purpose and will appear out of nowhere to take a quick three. Watching the T’Wolves play, even when they win, is drudgery. Watching the Warriors is magic.
By way of contrast, the Cavaliers’ win the next night in game 7 against the Celtics was a clunker. Cleveland’s offense consisted of LeBron James either driving or backing in to the basket for a layup or firing a pass to an open teammate in the corner who then missed a three-point shot. Boston, aside from some baby-hooks by Al Horford, was content to run a weave and pass around the arc until someone decided it was his turn to miss a three. Combined, the two teams were 16-for-74(!) from three-point range – hardly inspiring basketball and not much fun to watch.

Steph Curry

When most people shoot a jump shot, they pause for a split second at the top of their jump before releasing the ball. By the time Steph Curry reaches his apogee, the ball is seemingly already well on its way. His motion slightly resembles that of a shot-putter, although the shot-putter is large and ungainly, while the Golden State Warrior is slight and smooth as proverbial silk. His shot arcs higher in the air than normal, and perhaps for this reason when it falls through the basket the entry looks different, like a high diver slicing into the water on a perfect dive. Or maybe his shots are more in the basket’s center.

Style is merely the start of what distinguishes Curry’s shot. They almost all are launched behind the three-point line (but you knew that), and often are well beyond. Even when Curry shoots from midcourt or beyond at the end of a quarter, the crowd holds its collective breath. And as we have just witnessed in the final two games of the Western Conference Championships against Oklahoma City, an inordinate number of his baskets are clutch. Curry has tied each game, put his team ahead and nailed the coffin with dagger three-pointers that are demoralizing to the opponent well beyond the points added to the score.

Curry is not just a sharpshooter; if that were all he would scarcely rise above his teammate Klay Thompson, who is also a top five three-point shooter. Curry is the best dribbler in the game and a magician on short shots. When he goes to the basket he is met by taller, longer, heftier defenders, yet he regularly gets his shot away – whether it be a floater, scoop, reverse layup or high bank – and it usually goes in. His dribbling skill and quick feet also enable him to free himself for three-point shots, something almost no one else in the NBA does – catch-and-shoot being the standard procedure.

A final point in Curry’s favor is his engaging demeanor. His supreme confidence doesn’t come off as cocky, partly because of his baby-face, partly because everyone around him is so much bigger. He holds his mouthguard between his teeth, draped outside his lips; he punctuates his threes, when appropriate, with a fist clench or even watches them from a crouch; he waves to the crowd to ramp up their enthusiasm. He is the cool customer, the cool assassin.

Games 6 and 7 were the first NBA games I watched this year, and I picked two good ones. The Warriors were seemingly overmatched in the first half each time, as the Thunder controlled the rebounds and had two unstoppable forces in Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook. But once Thompson in the first game and Curry in the second started hitting implausible threes, you could see the Thunder spirits flag and their stars try to do too much. By the end of each game they had not just lost but were defeated. Analytically, a break here or there would seem to have been all they needed to change the outcome; but you got the feeling that somehow the Warriors, and above all Curry, wouldn’t let that happen.

I have no idea how the Warriors will do against LeBron James and the Cavaliers. For the sake of the city of Cleveland, I wouldn’t feel too bad should the Cavs prevail, and I worry that their more muscular play will be a challenge.  But my rooting interest will remain with the Warriors, to reward both their record-setting season and the beauty of their game. When Shaquille O’Neal played I couldn’t wait for him to retire, I so disliked the brute force he brought to the game. The basketball played by Curry and Thompson represents the opposite end of the spectrum and is thrilling to watch.

T-Wolves’ Last Shot

My season of Timberwolves-viewing got off on the same bad foot previous ones have ended on, with the T-Wolves unable to get off a decent shot with a chance to win the game. Last night it was against Kevin Garnett and the undefeated Celtics, who played a very losable game with the particular help of new addition Rasheed Wallace, who insisted on clanking three-pointers in the fourth quarter. Thus, the Wolves found themselves down 92-90 with the ball and 13 seconds left.
My complaint in years past has been their tendency, at this point, to stop cutting-and-passing, the way they play best, and leave the ball in the hands of the point guard, who dribbles the clock down to three seconds, then finds that he can’t make a play all by himself – the familiar isolation dribble that works fine if you have Allen Iverson or Dwyane Wade or LeBron James on your team. My complaint last night was the equally familiar NBA move: the coach calls timeout to “draw up a play” or “make sure the team knows what to do.”
First of all, any basketball player who doesn’t know that in this situation you wait for the last shot doesn’t belong in a gym, let alone the NBA. Second, it shouldn’t take a coaching genius to tell you that, facing a much stronger team, you should try for a three-pointer and the win, not overtime. Therefore, what wisdom is there left for the coach to impart during the timeout. Yes, he can “draw up a play,” but what have practices been for? And how many such plays ever get effectively executed, given the unknown of the opponent’s defense?
On the other hand, by calling timeout, the coach a) gives the defense time to make situational substitutions and organize itself, a greater advantage to the generally harried defense than the offense; b) loses precious seconds and perhaps even the ball by requiring his offense to run an in-bounds play; and c) kills the momentum the offense often has when it has made a defensive stop and is coming downcourt with a chance to win.
Last year, the Wolves couldn’t even get the ball in-bounds in this situation. Last night, they did – barely – then had to repeat themselves after the Celtics used their “foul-to-give,” another weapon the defense often forgets or is unable to employ absent a time-out called by the offense. The ensuing “play” consisted of Corey Brewer, one of their most erratic offensive weapons, driving to the basket, which in itself basically removed the chance of a three-point shot and victory. Kevin Garnett tied him up after a mild foul – but what ref would call a foul on a defensive player of the year in that situation? – and there went the Wolves’ chance.
I won’t mind if the Wolves play all their games this close and it comes down to the last shot. I will continue to be bothered, though, if in those games the Wolves don’t get off that last shot.