Monster – 5

“Bizarre,” was my constant thought as I watched this story unfold three times, a la Norman Conquests or, more fittingly I suppose, Rashomon. What was it about, and why should I care? A boyhood crush? An obsessed mother? A poorly run elementary school? The difficulties of being a school teacher in modern society? Director Kore-eda purposely withheld key information from each version of his story; but I felt he was playing games with the audience rather than accomplishing an artistic goal. There was little payoff, just a lot of questions, many unanswered.

Ferrari – 3.5

This is Napoleon for the racing-car world. Adam Driver gives a joyless impersonation of Enzo Ferrari that is the lugubrious equal of Joaquin Phoenix’s leaden Corsican. Penelope Cruz provides the only glimmer of life, as did Vanessa Kirby, playing the feisty but disgruntled and left-behind wife. The car-racing scenes recall the violence and senseless deaths of the European battlefields. Spectacle is big, but both films left me bored and cold.
“Based on a true story” often leads to dramatic problems. I suppose the events depicted are more-or-less what happened, but a satisfying story they do not make. There is no hero who rises to the occasion: in fact, the one charmer we are tempted to like ends up disembodied. All signs point to the climactic final race, the Mille Miglia, but other than showing a surprise winner we have barely met it is presented as anticlimax. The company, we are to believe, is to be saved not by daring or skill, or even luck, but by [spoiler alert] bribing journalists. This is the audience payoff?! Maybe, like the referenced Italian opera, this aspires to tragedy, but at least in opera there is good music.
My biggest problem was the usually reliable Adam Driver. Perhaps Michael Mann cast Driver after seeing him in House of Gucci, but here he is an empty big suit who smiles but once (at his son) and isn’t convincing as lover, corporate titan, former race car driver or even Italian. You wind up wondering, what’s he doing in this pseudo-Italian movie? Speaking of which, what’s with the actors speaking English with Italian accents? Instead of being realistic, it sounds like they’re from Jersey. And it makes them hard to understand. As for Shailene Woodley, as wholesome as apple pie, I couldn’t tell if she was speaking English because she was supposed to be an American.
As a sports nut, I usually can follow what’s happening on the playing field, but I was at a loss to understand the Mille Miglia, which I consider the film’s fault, not mine. Was this a race against time, but then what were the scenes of cars jockeying for position?  If it was a race among cars, what were the clunkers with numbers that were zoomed past by the Ferraris and Maseratis? And how were we to tell which of those were which? Enzo makes a point of instructing his driver to “show this card” at the checkpoint, as if this will be a critical factor, but unlike Chekov’s gun we never see it again. And, really, he tells his drivers how he wants them to race just as they are about to pull out of the gate?
Regarding my personal obsession with cigarettes in movies, my wife argues that they are true to the period depicted, yet to my surprise in this film taking place in 1957 Italy, when you’d think Enzo and his buddies would be smoking like Bernstein, they manage to portray their characters without a puff. There is still the obligatory and totally gratuitous cigarette when one of the Ferrari drivers implausibly prepares to light up in his vehicle until chastened by Enzo. My attention to this detail shows how engrossed I was in the story.

Wonka – 5

I think this Timothee Chalamet is going to be a star! The plot is beyond absurd, but the production values are excellent and the six-year-old with me was enthralled. (Then again it was only her second movie.) Calah Lane (Noodle) was a charmer, and the three minutes with Sally Hawkins gave me more pleasure than two hours of Ferrari.

Fallen Leaves – 8.5

Spare. Simple. Sweet. Director Aki Kaurismaki’s visual vocabulary sets the mood: images are planar, geometric, frill-less, close-up, held still. There is no recession into space until the final shot. The world is bleak: colors are drab, jobs are mundane, the outside world, via radio, is death in Ukraine. The supporting cast are notably unattractive–overweight, dour, uninspired. But our heroine and hero are so attractive you wonder how they can be struggling so much–in poverty, without good jobs, family or romantic partner and apparently only one friend. They meet and amid the terminal emptiness around them they act out the oldest story in the movies. It’s like a Lower Depths version of Notting Hill. Alma Poysti is sensational: a wink from her is dynamite. Jussi Vatanen is just as good, although he smokes like Leonard Bernstein. Time called this a perfect little movie, and I can’t disagree.

May December – 8

Suspense builds nicely as a TV star played by Natalie Portman, doing research for an upcoming film, visits the home of a former school teacher, played by Julianne Moore, who after an affair with a 13-year-old student followed by childbirth, incarceration and marriage is living unhappily ever after in their Savannah home. As the teacher-student story is based on a notorious real-life incident, we don’t question its plausibility; we grapple instead with the fissures in the relationships between the three principals: who is using whom? who is comfortable in their own skin? Portman is terrific in her role, and Charles Melton is getting awards for his performance as an adult who missed an adolescence. My only qualm was Moore, who is simply too good and glamorous an actress to convince me of who she was supposed to be.

Immediate Family – 7

A pleasant, if somewhat self-congratulatory, profile of the four studio musicians who seemingly played on every memorable singer-songwriter album of the ’70s. It also served, incidentally or not, as a promotional piece for their later-in-life tour, appearing at the Lobero on February 14. I don’t know enough to judge the musical chops the film showed, but the caliber and quantity of singers who praised their work–James Taylor, Carole King, Jackson Browne, Phil Collins, David Crosby, Linda Ronstadt, not to mention Warren Zevon, Joni Mitchell, Neil Young–speaks for itself. And when they went their individual ways they inspired Don Henley, Stevie Nicks, Keith Richards and even Jimmy Buffett. The resulting montage of song clips was nostalgia heaven, although it often left one wanting to hear more than the clip. The film itself was remarkably even-keeled and one-dimensional: no mention of families or private lives, any setbacks or disharmony (in the rock world!?), or musical disagreements. More than immediate, it was one happy family.

The Stones & Brian Jones – 6

It’s surprising that it takes a documentary to introduce the founder of the Rolling Stones and lead/rhythm guitarist until he was fired and died shortly thereafter in 1969, well after the Stones were world phenomena. Similarly surprising is that after watching the documentary he is still pretty much a cipher in my consciousness. Bill Wyman says a few interesting things, but otherwise Jones doesn’t emerge from the huge shadow of Jagger and Richards. Jones wrote no songs but fathered children with five different girlfriends, not what we’re looking for. Instead, we get a lot of screaming fans, which could be for anyone. Oh, yes, and his parents didn’t approve.

Priscilla – 7.5

A sad and bizarre story, told with exquisite delicacy and enough pink to tempt Barbie.  I don’t know how accurate the portrayal of Priscilla was (was she really that short?), but since Sofia Coppola’s script was based on Priscilla Presley’s book and Priscilla was an executive producer of the film, I’ll accept it, with some dramatic salt. Jacob Elordi’s Elvis, however, totally met my approval and was worlds better than Austin Butler’s in Elvis, as was the movie itself. Forgoing any Elvis songs, the film rested entirely on the very odd relationship that started when Elvis was 24 and Priscilla only 14. How Cailee Spaeny could play Priscilla convincingly at 14 then all the way to 27 amazed me. Even without Elvis’s songs, the music is very good.

Napoleon – 4

Perhaps Ridley Scott watched The Crown and thought, Hey, I can do this for France. Unfortunately, his swings at royal romance, political intrigue and historical drama were all whiffs. For some reason, Joaquin Phoenix as the lead was made to appear uncharismatic, uncoordinated, a terrible lover, phlegmatic and taciturn – hardly the image of the almost-conqueror of Europe. Vanessa Kirby was at least interesting, while the plethora of courtiers were indistinguishable. As the title proclaimed, the movie was about one person, and he was boring.

Maestro – 4

Hard to decide what bothered me more: the bizarre accents and clipped, unintelligible dialogue from Bradley Cooper, especially, and Carey Mulligan; the characters’, especially Cooper’s, obsessive smoking; or the lack of a plot. Rather than care for Lenny Bernstein, I couldn’t wait for this unpleasant person to get off the screen. Sarah Silverman, on the other hand, I liked. I admit to a personal dislike of gratuitous smoking in movies; here there was only one scene in which Cooper wasn’t lighting up: conducting his Mass in a cathedral. The rest of the time, even when conducting, a cigarette was in his mouth or his hand, to dramatic detriment not effect. A very unenjoyable two hours.