Broadway ’24

Our first two shows on Broadway for the spring 2024 season shared sensational staging. For Enemy of the People, lighting by paraffin lamps, spare furniture and drab black costumes at Circle in the Square let us feel we were back in 19th century Norway. Postwar London for The Who’s Tommy wasn’t so much a location as an electric charge: glowing rectangles for doors and mirrors flew across the stage, setting the scenes without distracting from the energy of the music. Both shows delivered. Tommy is the nonpareil rock opera. What was lost in not having Pete Townshend’s guitar was gained in having Broadway singers inhabiting the various roles. Tommy at three ages added charm to the tough story. The second act suffered in comparison to the first, which has the show-stoppers, and as a plot is harder to follow. The score is great and the production of Pinball Wizard brought tears to my eyes.
Ibsen’s play is didactic, and the message resonates as loudly today as it must have in 1882. The downside is that the supporting cast are positions, not real people. Their performances seemed a bit below par; I couldn’t tell if the fault was the casting–with notably an African-American, Asian-American and dwarf standing in for 19th century rural Norwegians–or the play’s architecture. Regardless, the two leads, played by Jeremy Strong and Michael Imperioli, held the stage and carried the day.

Lincoln Center Theatre’s production of Uncle Vanya was misconceived, miscast and misdirected. Other than that… Taking the play out of 1890s Russia left it floating in a senseless place, with doctors making month-long house calls, Blacks talking jive and Steve Carrell playing Steve Carrell. Alfred Molina was excellent as the professor, but he made the rest of the cast unconvincing. Carrell’s sarcastic stage-hogging didn’t equate, for me, with a long-suffering estate manager, and none of the personal relationships on display made emotional sense. In contrast to the above shows, the set was minimal, contributing to the placelessness of the production, and the thrust stage meant an actor’s back was in our way much of the time.

We also had a sightline problem at Stereophonic: seated third-row center, with the stage raised above us, we frequently had the two studio engineers blocking our view of the actors in the recording studio behind and above them. Whether our proximity exaggerated the bass guitar volume I don’t know, but the music was unpleasantly loud. We had seen the apparently identical Off-Broadway production at Playwrights’ Horizon last May, so the novelty and excitement of discovery were gone on this viewing. The play itself, however, held up. It’s hard to think of another play where there are seven so well defined characters who each get their due. And in stark comparison to everything else we’ve seen this spring, these were “real” people. Eli Gelb, as the schlumpy engineer Grover, has won awards and should win more, but all the others, led by Sarah Pidgeon and Will Brill, were just as memorable. I understand why the Tonys are treating this as a “play,” not a “musical,” but what you hear of the songs made me want to buy the record.

Speaking of musicals, there are two kinds: one where songs are written for the production and “jukebox” musicals where pre-existing hit songs are cobbled together around a plot. And then there are two kinds of jukebox musicals: one where the songs are presented as the hit songs they are (viz., Jersey Boys, A Beautiful Noise, Ain’t Too Proud to Beg) and the other where they are incorporated into the story, a la the more traditional kind of musical (viz., Mamma Mia, Return to Margaritaville, New York, New York). Hell’s Kitchen, the Alicia Keys story, is the latter, and because I didn’t know any of her hit songs I found myself wondering if the story was taking a direction so a song could be shoehorned in. Not that there was anything terribly unusual, or original, in the mad-at-my-mother, falling-foolishly-in-love teenager who discovers-herself-through-music and makes it story. The generally mellower songs in the second act grabbed me more and the earnest and lively production was engaging throughout (when I could see around the head of the gentleman in front of me). The big letdown was the absence of the star whom we had expressly come to see, Maleah Joi Moon. Her understudy played the part and sang the songs flawlessly, but she didn’t have the personal charm needed to win you over.

Patriots felt more like a history lesson than a play, and a pretty intense one at that. Peter Morgan used his tools for dramatizing the British royal family and applied them to Putin’s rise in Russia, as told through the eyes of oligarch Boris Berezovsky. Michael Stuhlbarg did yeoman’s work in the lead, although his acting tics got on my nerves by the end. Will Keen as Putin was commanding. Luke Thallon played Roman Abramovich as a sweetheart, maybe out of concern for British libel laws, and the supporting cast was flawless. There wasn’t much emotion or character development; what we walked out of the theater with was our thoughts on Russia and Putin.

Cabaret at the August Wilson Theater turned Kit Kat Club put us right back into the political world. The second act, when the Nazis appeared, was half as long and twice as good as the first act, which introduced the characters and gave us a lot of louche that became monotonous. Eddie Redmayne was sensational as the twisting, twisted emcee, while Bebe Neuwirth and Steven Skybell created the only genuinely emotional relationship. Gayle Rankin’s Sallie Bowles made me long for Liza Minelli, and the man playing Clifford Bradshaw made me long for a better actor.

In sum, it was a disappointing Broadway season (and, unusually, we didn’t venture Off-Broadway). The only moment I felt transported was during Tommy’s Pinball Wizard. The only play I would wholeheartedly recommend was Stereophonic, and its second time around wasn’t as good for me due to sight and sound issues. And in most of the productions I saw performances that didn’t measure up. As I waited in line at TKTS for Patriots, I realized that we got to see everything I wanted to.

 

Coup de Chance 7.5

An old-form Woody Allen short story, set in the streets and party rooms of Paris instead of New York: four characters, lots of talk about marriage and life, and just when you start to care about what happens to the people we get a goofy, comic ending. It’s fun to be back in France and back in ’70s cinema.

Challengers – 3

Never have I cared less who won a tennis match. Or, for that matter, spent two hours with three less attractive, less interesting people. Pretty much everything about the tennis rang false, except perhaps the arrested development of the players. If this is what’s getting good reviews these days, heaven help the viewers over a certain age.

About Dry Grasses – 7

I felt I was watching My Dinner With Andre, times three or four, held in a rural, charmless Turkish village in winter, in the snow. The “hero” tested the viewer’s sympathy by lying to his student, psychologically abusing her, betraying his roommate, taking advantage of a disabled woman and being a crappy teacher. But he was never at a loss for words. And he was an exceptional photographer, in an aside that was extraneous to the plot. Even though everything moved slowly, at length, over the film’s 3:20 I didn’t quite catch who some of the characters were. Or why our hero walked out of his village into a movie studio at one point. I will say that after thinking I would leave after an hour, I fell into the film’s rhythm–it was well made–and made it to spring, when the dry grasses appeared out of nowhere.

Immaculate – 6

What better setting for a horror flick than a convent somewhere out in the Italian countryside? When Sydney Sweeney, playing a young naif from Detroit, takes her vows in a foreign tongue she little expects that the Immaculate Conception of the movie’s title will be thrust, unwillingly as 20 centuries before, upon her. The Catholic Church sustains another nail in the coffin, but that ship may have already left port.

Io Capitano – 8.8

Matteo Garrone, a master director, created multiple vivid and convincing worlds: the shanties of Dakar, the emptiness of the Sahara, the hellholes of Libya, the turbulence of a Mediterranean crossing, just to name his principal locations. The artistry of his shots also fed the most beautiful closing credits I’ve ever seen. The settings  were secondary, however, to the gripping, and shocking, story of two Senegalese cousins lured to Europe by a dream. While we can only hope for a happy ending to their story, the film title–”I  Captain”–marks the personal growth of Seydou, the astonishing 16-year-old who carries the film.

Society of the Snow – NR

I couldn’t get past the horrible dubbing of the Netflix version to give this a serious viewing. The subject did not appeal to me, hence I avoided it in the theater, and the hokey, inauthentic English-language dialogue left me, so to speak, cold.

The Teachers’ Lounge – 8

A sweetly intense performance by Leonie Benesch as a new sixth-grade teacher having a bad week at school. I couldn’t figure out how the various conflicts would get resolved, and felt better when  the director couldn’t either. In the meantime, though, there were memorable characters and dilemmas that made you think in this worthy Oscar submission from Germany.

Oscar Nominations

With so many presumptive winners already in place, thanks to industry scuttlebutt and numerous awards from critics and industry groups, it is the nomination announcements that offer modest surprises and merit discussion. And with one movie, Oppenheimer, so clearly superior to the rest of the field, the Oscar ceremony itself will tend to boring; so best take my whacks at the field now.
Best Picture: As mentioned, Oppenheimer is a thoroughly deserving winner, and it should take home awards for its director Christopher Nolan, original score, supporting actor (Robert Downey Jr.) and a number of the technical awards I’m not competent to judge (editing, etc.) Anatomy of A Fall is probably my second favorite movie, so I’m delighted, and surprised, to see it here. I also applaud Barbie, American Fiction and The Holdovers, although it’s hard to think of them as Best Picture material. I didn’t even like Maestro, Killers of the Flower Moon and Poor Things. I was one of the few not entranced by Past Lives, and Zone of Interest has made it neither to a streaming service nor Santa Barbara. I would replace Past Lives with the similar but superior Fallen Leaves, and the three big budget bombs with, say, May December, Air and Priscilla. Not that they should win, but I would at least enjoy seeing clips from them again.
Best Actress: All acknowledge that this is the loaded category, or in World Cup terms the Group of Death, where some worthy contender(s) will lose out. Already losing out in the nominations was Natalie Portman, who gave a subtle and convincing performance in May December, a film that was surprisingly snubbed all around. Sandra Huller was great, but so was her lookalike Alma Poysti in Fallen Leaves. And Margot Robbie certainly deserves something for conceiving, producing and embodying Barbie, the movie sensation of the year. As for the actual nominees, I couldn’t stand Emma Stone; Carey Mulligan was delightful but has had more difficult roles; Annette Bening was excellent, but her movie won’t carry her. Lily Gladstone was far and away the best thing in Killers of the Flower Moon and a vote for her would be historic and will allow Academy members to bypass Martin Scorsese and Robert DeNiro, as they should.
Best Actor: Colman Domingo’s Rustin hasn’t shown here, or if it did I missed it. I disliked Bradley Cooper in Maestro as much as Emma Stone in Poor Things, so that leaves me with Paul Giamatti, Jeffrey Wright and Cillian Murphy, all of whom performed admirably, if not exceptionally. I favor Giamatti, only because he so exceeded my low expectations, but I would be happy with any of the three. With so many of the good movies starring women there weren’t a surfeit of flashy male leads and I’m thrilled that Leonardo DiCaprio was omitted. I did like the always reliable Matt Damon in Air, but comedies get no respect.
Supporting Actor: What qualifies as “supporting” always troubles me. There should be a limit on screen time or lines if you want to be in this category. Comparing Ryan Gosling’s role in Barbie to Sterling K. Brown’s in American Fiction is like comparing a watermelon to a grape. Yes, the movie wasn’t named after him, but Ken was nothing if not a co-lead. I didn’t fancy him in the movie, but he seemed like a good guy when receiving the Kirk Douglas Award at the SBIFF Gala, so I won’t begrudge him the Oscar if he somehow upsets Robert Downey Jr. I couldn’t stand DeNiro or Mark Ruffalo, so this seems a weak field. How about Tobias Menzies in You Hurt My Feelings? Or Ben Affleck in Air? Both comedies, although Ruffalo’s and Brown’s weren’t exactly serious roles. Dominic Sessa held his own with nominees Giamatti and Randolph in The Holdovers. And Jacob Elordi was a remarkable Elvis in Priscilla, especially compared to last year’s Austin Butler.
Supporting Actress: May December and Nyad were very similar in having female co-leads. Why the producers determined that Julianne Moore should be entered in the Supporting field with Natalie Portman as the Lead I have no idea, although since neither was nominated it’s not an issue. Jodie Foster’s character “supported” Bening’s, but her role in the film was just as crucial. I thought she was the weak link, though. America Ferrara is a really nice nomination (in a truly “supporting” role), but Da’Vine Joy Randolph checks all the boxes.
Best Director: This should be a slam-dunk for Christopher Nolan. My only comment is astonishment at the exclusion of Greta Gerwig, who performed the seemingly impossible task of creating an intelligent sophisticated movie about a doll that was both artistic and commercial. And as much as I admired Anatomy of a Fall, why is its director here? Original Screenplay, where it has a better chance, would have been enough.
Everything Else: Once again I’m dumbfounded that so many technical awards go to Best Picture nominees. Oppenheimer is truly great, but does it really qualify as one of the year’s best, out of all movies made, in all the categories in which it received nominations: Production Design; Costume Design; Cinematography; Editing; Makeup and Hair Styling; Sound; Original Score? As I mentioned, we’ll be hearing that name a lot, come March 10.

Nyad – 6.5

Recommended mainly for the performance by Annette Bening (so much better than Emma Stone’s), who created a character that neatly meshed with the archival footage of the eponymous marathon swimmer. The story of inhuman endurance was catnip for directors Chin/Vasarhelyi, after Meru, Free Solo and Rescue. Their problem here is that swimming from Cuba to Key West is neither as photogenic or dramatic as mountain climbing, and when the story requires them to show the same thing four times it verges on boring. The moments of drama (e.g., shark attack) were trite and predictable, but through it all Bening was a force and a character to cheer for.