Alamar – 6.5

[MSPFF] Perfectly lovely Mexican portrait of a grandfather-father-and-son living off and learning about the sea – a gentle sea over a coral reef in the Gulf of Mexico. The ruggedly handsome looks of the father and the way they caught fish and lobster made the movie fun to watch. The characters’ hermetic existence – “At night, I drink coffee and watch the stars” – made it seem more fiction than documentary; and the film’s renunciation of drama and plot surprised the audience but, once we caught on, gradually won us over.

Harlan – the Jew Suss – 3

[MSPIFF] A repetitive and poorly edited documentary about a movie director in Nazi Germany, the anti-Semitic film he made and the current views of his descendants. There was no coherent point and we didn’t even get a very good sense of the underlying film. Just the same talking heads over and over, with nothing surprising to say.

Summer Pasture – 5

[MSPIFF] I have yet to see a film about Tibetan (or Mongolian) nomads that wasn’t overwhelmingly beautiful, and this was no exception. Unfortunately, there was no story or drama, except for two minutes when the yaks went missing. When committing to film a summer in the life of a nomad family, the documentary filmmakers need some luck to have something interesting happen. This time there wasn’t any.

Women Without Men – 8

Far and away the most beautiful movie I have seen, or probably will see, this year, Shirin Neshat’s study of Iran in 1953 packed a social and political wallop as well. The liner notes and the director’s dialogue explained much that I would have missed, notably America’s role in overthrowing democracy in Iran 50 years before we purport to be demanding it there, and the analogy between the man’s role in the family and the dictator’s role in the country. Of the women without men, two existed in the real world, two in a world of magic realism, but their experiences were similar and taken together they encompassed a large swath of Iranian society, from the prostitute to the aristocrat, from traditional to cosmopolitan. This was a movie to think about, and talk about, after the screening, and Neshat’s images, especially the woman Musin on the rooftop, are indelible.

Red Riding 1974, 1980, 1983 – 6.8

Long on style, short on sense, these three made-for-TV crime dramas had a Twin Peaks flavor to them, with suspenseful music and an overriding sensation of never knowing exactly what was going on. Partly this was due to the Yorkshire accent, which begged for subtitling, but mostly it was due to the misdirection, which withheld key items of information and threw in red herrings instead. Who killed whom in the Karachi Club after Eddie Dunford took his revenge? Why? What happened to the shopping mall? What happened to the corrupt cops? To Helen Marshall? Why did she have a relationship with Rev. Laws? Why did Peter Hunter’s wife keep calling him? So many of the characters and situations seemed familiar from Prime Suspect and other shows of that ilk, most of which I preferred. It does seem that the scriptwriters in London have a pretty low opinion of what goes on out in the English boondocks. Red Riding (what does that mean?) did offer one novel twist: the three episodes had a common bad guy but a different hero, each of whom was suitably engaging.

The Runaways – 5

On my list of rock’n’roll biopics, this would come in at #27. Every well-worn element was present: dysfunctional family, rebellious teens, Svengali producer, drugs, clashing egos, band breakup, good (not great) soundtrack. On the other hand, I would be happy watching Kristen Stewart read the phonebook, so seeing her play hard-rocking Joan Jett was a treat. Dakota Fanning, not so much.

Girl with the Dragon Tattoo – 6

No criticisms, but the movie seemed rather ho-hum and superficial in comparison with the book. It kept me engaged, but mostly to see how the next plot development would be handled – what would be skipped, what elided.

Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans – 7.5

Totally over-the-top performance by Nicolas Cage, one of my favorite ott actors, in film by Werner Herzog, my favorite ott director. Corrupt on the outside, with great police instincts on the inside, our lieutenant with the consuming drug addiction found new ways to be hysterical in every scene and somehow made me root for his amoral ride through life. The happy ending was a neat bit of legerdemain. An interesting film to compare with Crazy Heart.

Ghost Writer – 7

Extremely Hitchcockian music, by Alexandre Desplat, and the bleakly austere setting of “Martha’s Vineyard,” made one sense danger at every turn. Pierce Brosnan, Ewan MacGregor and especially Olivia Williams acted beautifully, and the pieces fit together like a Swiss watch. In short, this was a wonderfully made film. The only problem was the plot, which required one to accept that the CIA, without a recent success to its name, could engineer Britain’s entry into the Iraq War; and that the generally impotent (v. major powers) International Court of Justice could provoke a worldwide hue-and-cry over a Prime Minister’s “rendition” of four alleged terrorists, when the U.S. was doing worse on a weekly basis. Undoubtedly, this story would play better in Europe, where director Roman Polanski, for familiar reasons, is in exile.

Oscar Review

No real surprises among this year’s Oscar winners, although Time’s prediction sheet managed 12 wrong, to 12 right. What dawned on me, however, as it must have before, is how much the Oscars are little more than a popularity contest, rather than a recognition of technical talent. I’m not referring to Sandra Bullock’s win over Meryl Streep’s far more amazing performance; instead, I’m looking at the secondary awards, things like sound mixing.
Now, I am no cinema expert and am in no position to judge films on technical merit; but surely there must be films that aren’t particularly “good” that nevertheless are blessed with extraordinary cinematography or sound editing. But it so happens that of the five nominees for sound editing, all five were also best picture nominees. And we all know that it was not the sound editing that got them included on the best picture list! The situation is not so extreme, but close to it, for all the other categories that apply to every movie released last year, with the exception of makeup (more on that in a minute).
Every movie would seemingly qualify for the awards in art direction, cinematography, film editing, sound editing, sound mixing and, for most, original screenplay. But guess what: Hurt Locker, which happened to win best picture and director, won in four of those six, and presumptive runnerup Avatar won the other two. Now, I felt all along that Hurt Locker was the best American movie of the year, but on its “low budget,” could it really have had the best sound? In other words, if you’re a technical genius but your movie is not one of the two or three favorites of the Academy crowd, you can forget winning an Oscar.
There are two more categories I have omitted that also apply to every film but whose nominations don’t mirror the best picture: costume design and makeup. I exclude the former because, while every movie has costumes, this category is clearly aimed at “costume dramas,” movies employing out-of-the-ordinary clothing, like this year’s winner, The Young Victoria, or even movies about clothing, like Coco Before Chanel. One could almost say the same for makeup, citing the winning Star Trek, where the makeup created alien races. But the makeup in the other nominees, Il Divo and The Young Victoria, was no more extreme than that found in many other flicks – yet the Academy, for this category alone among the 24, offered only three nominations. Maybe for this award they really voted for best makeup, not best picture.