Perfect Day – 6.5

Even a mundane, uneventful life can contain mini-dramas seemed to be one takeaway from Wim Wenders’s portrait of a veteran Tokyo Toilet employee. Then there’s also a reflection of the Japanese ethic: even the humblest job can be performed with diligence, as an art. And maybe the lack of greed and ambition that keeps Japanese society running smoothly, although the younger generation is primed to upset that. Unfortunately, mundane, uneventful and lack of ambition don’t make for an exciting movie, and when each new day arrives, we greet it more with, “Really, this again?” than with excitement. The catalogue of Tokyo’s public toilets, which was Wenders’s original commission, is perhaps the most interesting aspect of the resulting feature film.

Zone of Interest – 9

Disquieting, thought-provoking, beautifully filmed and acted. “Is this what it was really like?,” is only the first of many questions. How would the revelation that this was Auschwitz have hit us if we hadn’t known ahead of time, from the reviews? How did German actors feel about portraying their history as told by a British director? Why was there a black dog running through so many of the scenes? Why was the commandant vomiting at movie’s end? I don’t know how to describe, technically, the square, straight-on long shots that director Jonathan Glazer used throughout the film, but it provided visual consistency and power: you are looking at this in full, without editorial comments. (The leads’ ugly hairstyles may have prejudiced the viewer, but I think they were props to help us identify the characters.) And as with many great films of ideas, I can’t remember whether it was shot in color or black-and-white.

Taste of Things – 5

A paean to French cuisine, featuring a cast straight out of 19th-century paintings by Fantin-Latour, Manet, Caillebotte, Cezanne, Monet, Toulouse-Lautrec (you get the picture). Unfortunately, it is as devoid of plot as any film I can remember. Identifying ingredients and cooking methods can only go so far, and when another meal starts it’s time to look at your watch.

The Promised Land – 6

A Danish version of Shane, without the subtlety. There wasn’t a character, plot development or scene that offered any surprise. Mads Mikkelsen is a pleasure to watch, but he joined the class of Joaquin Phoenix and Adam Driver for fewest facial expressions in a role. I couldn’t count the number of movie cliches that piled atop each other, although it was nice to get a glimpse of 18th-century Denmark.

Anselm – 8

An artwork by master director Wim Wenders about the unique and overwhelming art of Anselm Kiefer, for my money the greatest living artist. The 3-D projection floats us into the world of Kiefer’s sculpture, architecture and deeply perspective paintings. We see hints of his artmaking technique: slabbing on paint (or tar?), pouring lead, blowtorching vegetal matter. There is little information about how he can produce so much large art: a library of lead books, an acre of leaning towers, enormous paintings that fill the walls of the Doge’s Palace, etc., etc. Through recreations and archival footage we see the younger Kiefer challenging Germany’s WWII amnesia. Best of all, we see Kiefer in the long halls, the stubbled fields and the sunflower patches that become subjects of his art. The camera never moves outside his art. It rests when Kiefer does. This is a definitive, even essential, document.

The Boy and the Heron – 6.5

This hand-drawn animated feature by the 83-year-old Hayao Miyazaki, purportedly the “most expensive film” ever made in Japan, is visually breathtaking. The movie’s first half, when young Mahito is taken to the country estate of his new mother, captures everything I saw and felt in my high-school summer in Japan, with a landscape from Yoshida or Hasui. The second half, a fantastical journey through an underworld that is less Japanese and more Wizard of Oz, grew repetitive and tiresome and would have improved by being cut a half-hour. There are messages about peace, love and understanding stitched in near the end, but they don’t feel deserved. Again, the “real world” is compelling; the land of pelicans and parakeets not so much. The music–a series of songs more than a score–is equally enchanting.

American Fiction – 7

An engaging cast of caricatures tickles some serious subjects in the first (or at least best)  Black-Lives-Matters-Culture-Page-backlash film of the year. I’m generally uneasy watching someone pretending to be someone he isn’t and experienced that discomfort here, but it all worked out in the clever end, which added an additional meta layer on Cord Jefferson’s rumination on race, literature, family and relationships. Jeffrey Wright is excellent as, among other attributes, a proud Black man who won’t be defined by race.
[I promised to stop this obsession, but I can’t help but note how gratuitous the one cigarette-smoking scene was: the sister, a minor character who leaves the film early, lights up while driving home. “I didn’t know you started smoking again,” our hero comments. That’s it. What is the Hollywood rule, written or merely observed, that requires a cigarette to appear in every film?]

Monster – 5

“Bizarre,” was my constant thought as I watched this story unfold three times, a la Norman Conquests or, more fittingly I suppose, Rashomon. What was it about, and why should I care? A boyhood crush? An obsessed mother? A poorly run elementary school? The difficulties of being a school teacher in modern society? Director Kore-eda purposely withheld key information from each version of his story; but I felt he was playing games with the audience rather than accomplishing an artistic goal. There was little payoff, just a lot of questions, many unanswered.

Ferrari – 3.5

This is Napoleon for the racing-car world. Adam Driver gives a joyless impersonation of Enzo Ferrari that is the lugubrious equal of Joaquin Phoenix’s leaden Corsican. Penelope Cruz provides the only glimmer of life, as did Vanessa Kirby, playing the feisty but disgruntled and left-behind wife. The car-racing scenes recall the violence and senseless deaths of the European battlefields. Spectacle is big, but both films left me bored and cold.
“Based on a true story” often leads to dramatic problems. I suppose the events depicted are more-or-less what happened, but a satisfying story they do not make. There is no hero who rises to the occasion: in fact, the one charmer we are tempted to like ends up disembodied. All signs point to the climactic final race, the Mille Miglia, but other than showing a surprise winner we have barely met it is presented as anticlimax. The company, we are to believe, is to be saved not by daring or skill, or even luck, but by [spoiler alert] bribing journalists. This is the audience payoff?! Maybe, like the referenced Italian opera, this aspires to tragedy, but at least in opera there is good music.
My biggest problem was the usually reliable Adam Driver. Perhaps Michael Mann cast Driver after seeing him in House of Gucci, but here he is an empty big suit who smiles but once (at his son) and isn’t convincing as lover, corporate titan, former race car driver or even Italian. You wind up wondering, what’s he doing in this pseudo-Italian movie? Speaking of which, what’s with the actors speaking English with Italian accents? Instead of being realistic, it sounds like they’re from Jersey. And it makes them hard to understand. As for Shailene Woodley, as wholesome as apple pie, I couldn’t tell if she was speaking English because she was supposed to be an American.
As a sports nut, I usually can follow what’s happening on the playing field, but I was at a loss to understand the Mille Miglia, which I consider the film’s fault, not mine. Was this a race against time, but then what were the scenes of cars jockeying for position?  If it was a race among cars, what were the clunkers with numbers that were zoomed past by the Ferraris and Maseratis? And how were we to tell which of those were which? Enzo makes a point of instructing his driver to “show this card” at the checkpoint, as if this will be a critical factor, but unlike Chekov’s gun we never see it again. And, really, he tells his drivers how he wants them to race just as they are about to pull out of the gate?
Regarding my personal obsession with cigarettes in movies, my wife argues that they are true to the period depicted, yet to my surprise in this film taking place in 1957 Italy, when you’d think Enzo and his buddies would be smoking like Bernstein, they manage to portray their characters without a puff. There is still the obligatory and totally gratuitous cigarette when one of the Ferrari drivers implausibly prepares to light up in his vehicle until chastened by Enzo. My attention to this detail shows how engrossed I was in the story.

Wonka – 5

I think this Timothee Chalamet is going to be a star! The plot is beyond absurd, but the production values are excellent and the six-year-old with me was enthralled. (Then again it was only her second movie.) Calah Lane (Noodle) was a charmer, and the three minutes with Sally Hawkins gave me more pleasure than two hours of Ferrari.