Here – 3

This Belgian film spelled its title with a backward “r,” but it could just as well have been called “Where,” or even “Why?” The film festival programmer previewed it as “a film about soup, moss and love.” If he had added rain, a car in a repair shop and a Chinese diner he would have covered everything. Oh, and a vacation that never happened. The camera seemed stuck, the story was implausible–especially the bit about the soup, but the love affair was not far behind. There was a nice punch line at the end, but it didn’t make up for the preceding 80 minutes I’d waited in vain for something to happen. A rave reviewer called it “miraculously weightless.” I agree.

Damsels in Distress (2012) – 6.5

Interesting that less than a dozen years ago a film could run wild with jokes about suicide. The humor also seemed dated, unless you’re still reading the Harvard Lampoon and watching Chevy Chase flicks. My viewing partner called it “stupid,” but I found it stupid funny. Greta Gerwig starred, with her trademark intelligent-naive affect, leading a cadre (coven?) of attractive college coeds who adopt a mission of raising their fraternity counterparts from hopeless stupidity, only to find their intellectual and moral superiority doesn’t protect them from romantic vulnerability. In short, this overlooked effort by Whit Stillman is nothing less than a proto-Barbie.

Between Two Worlds – 6.5

A beatific Juliette Binoche is onscreen this entire film, which makes it worth watching if, like me, you relish her acting and beauty. The story of a journalist going undercover to do a book on cleaning ladies has a ring of truth, which it is, and the film reads more as social commentary than drama.

Vertigo (1958) – 5

Seeing Vertigo on critics’ lists of all-time best films, including Time’s last week, and not remembering if I’d seen it, we rented it for TV viewing. Our first reaction was that it must have been colorized, so garish were the reds and greens. Whatever the cause, it gave the film a very dated look, along with all the artificial driving scenes. The next problem I had was with the acting, or maybe the characterizations. Kim Novak’s performance was wooden, or more accurately stoney. James Stewart was typical James Stewart, a gee-whiz naif, which didn’t comport with his role as a San Francisco police detective. And while he was clearly infatuated with her, there was little chemistry between them. I never suspected her love for Scottie until she announced it. Barbara Bel Geddes was better as Midge, but I couldn’t figure out that relationship either.
Those problems, however, paled compared to the plot. Right at the start Scottie is left dangling from a bent gutter with no visible means of rescue or escape as his police partner falls to his death. He walks with a cane for a short while afterward, but we are never told what happened, other than this causing an acute case of “vertigo.” The plot that follows, of course, pivots around a murder/fake suicide that exceeds Scottie’s rooftop escape for implausibility. In order to dispose of his wealth (and inherit her fortune), shipping magnate Gavin Elster convinces his girlfriend to impersonate his wife (no one else notices?), have her pretend to be haunted by an ancestor and seduce his old friend Scottie, and then lure him up a belltower firm in the belief that Scottie won’t be able to reach the top, where he is waiting with his dead wife, ready for defenestration. Oh, and then escape from the belltower unnoticed, another point that Hitchcock finessed. Surely there were better, safer ways to do away with one’s spouse.
In fairness, the film’s followers focus on its story of obsession, not its murder plot. Scottie is clearly obsessed, but it’s not pretty, nor particularly convincing. He browbeats Judy (the resurrected Madeleine) in an over-the-top manner that keeps raising the questions, what does he think he’s doing and why does she put up with it? When he is so obsessed, though, how does he flip the switch so completely when he sees her necklace? Would he really have even noticed it? And how would he have made such a quick mental calculation? In short, the whole film was one big, dated implausibility that, to my mind, ranks well behind The Man Who Knew Too Much, North By Northwest, Psycho, 39 Steps, Rear Window, Strangers On a Train and probably others.

Theater Camp – 7

A lightweight but enjoyable piffle, with Adam Platt and Molly Gordon riffing on Woody Allen: those who can’t act, teach; those who can’t teach, teach summer camp. Not all the pokes at acting school land, at least not for outsiders, but you can’t go wrong with talented kid actors, and the let’s-put-on-a-show finale is worth the wait. Meanwhile, the explanatory and narrative on-screen texts had tears of laughter streaming down my face.

Afire – 7.7

A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Loser. Leon is an aspiring author who is insecure and nerdy: he always wears long black pants, even to the beach. The movie is about how he navigates among four self-assured companions at a seaside retreat. Answer: not very well. The characters are well drawn and Paula Beer is a wonderful actress: when she smiles her eyes jump off the screen. This is a character study and not a major Christian Petzold, a la Barbara or Transit, but still a serious film.

Barbie – 8

A total goof with a popular message: give the women a chance! BarbieLand is a bit like Schmigadoon meets The Truman Show, and its main feature is a bevy of Barbies, led by Margot Robbie, whose gorgeousness is enough of a reason to see the movie. Ryan Gosling as Ken, not so much. The plot is clever but no great shakes; what makes the film fun are the supersmart if extraneous interjections and allusions: a criticism of Citizens United, Rhea Perlman as the Wizard of Oz, and pretty much everything involving Kate McKinnon and Will Ferrell. America Ferreira is a standout as the sole representative of Reality. What fun to watch a movie in the Arlington with a large audience primed to root for the home team!

Oppenheimer – 9

Big–in themes, personalities, production values, cast, drama, historical significance and lessons for today. Three hours and I never looked at my watch. Christopher Nolan’s trademark nonlinear storytelling technique–confusing and distracting in Memento and Tenet, inter alia–works to heighten the tension in scenes with more conversation than action. With almost 80 named characters it can be a challenge to remember who is who, but Louisa Hall’s novel Trinity gave me a head start and the use of familiar actors like Matt Damon, Kenneth Branagh and Casey Affleck gave some comfort. The key to everything, of course, is Cillian Murphy’s portrayal of Oppenheimer, which is riveting but never showy. (Unfamiliar to me, Murphy is a Nolan regular and Irish!) His story is tragic, but the story of the atom bomb, and man’s place on the planet, is bigger.

The Night of the 12th – 6

It takes away suspense when the film announces at the outset that it’s about a murder that won’t get solved. The rest of the movie shows why other movies eschew that route. What, then, was this about? The relationships? Ho-hum. The characters? Not very interesting. Societal issues? Not very deep. Mildly interesting as a French police procedural, but nothing in comparison to Spiral.

The Innocent – 8

A cleverly plotted, very funny crime caper peopled with delightfully idiosyncratic characters. Every moment is fun an the relationships are touching. Only in French cinema would the robbery target be a shipment of caviar.